Judgment Analysis

INTRODUCTION The Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Miss Subhra Chakraborty[1] case resulted in a significant ruling in favour of rape victims. In this case, the Supreme Court rendered an important decision, determining that under Article 32[2] of the Indian Constitution, it has the power to award damages for violations of fundamental rights, including interim damages for […]

This Appeal was filed by the Appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)[i], The Appeal was filed by Directors of the Company M/s. Durga Builders Pvt Ltd (“the Company” for short) invoking the provisions of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the

Facts of the Case: The issue of bail in India has been a contentious issue for many years, with many accused persons languishing in prison for extended periods without trial. In SMWP (Criminal) 4/2021 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India was called upon to determine the constitutionality of the current policy strategy for granting bail

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (hereinafter referred to as the “NCDRC”) decision from 03 December 2003 is challenged in the current Civil Appeal Nos. 5352 and 5353 of 2007. In a nutshell, the facts are that the Respondent No. 1 (M/s. Harsolia Motors), which is in the business of sale of vehicles, purchased fire

In this case, An FIR was lodged on 02nd November 2019 at the Police Station Dewa, District Barabanki, and according to information received by an informer, Assistant Sub Inspector Dharmendra Kumar Yadav and other police personnel reached Sarasudi Village near the school, and when they reached, they saw a person holding a sack, on seeing

In the present case, a raid on receival of secret information by the police was conducted which led to the arrest of four accused alleged to have possession of 180 kilograms of ganja. On the basis of the confession of one of the accused, the present appellant Mohd. Muslim was arrested for committing of offence

Facts of the case: This case of Arup Rabha v. The State of Assam & another, was filed by the appellant assailing the judgement and order dated 03.12.2018 passed by the learned Additional Session Judge, Goalpara in Sessions Case No.25/2016 convicting the sole appellant (Arup Rabha) for committing offences under Sections 364(A)/302/201 of The Indian

Issues –1. Infringement of Registered Trademark and Copyright – RPG.2. Whether there has been an infringement of the trademark of the plaintiff by the defendants under Section 29(4) of the Act?3. Do the defendants’ use of the trade mark and/or trade name containing ‘RPG’ as its only leading, essential and prominent feature in respect of their services

Issue –1. Dispute regarding ownership of immovable and movable properties between two real brothers.2. Is it compulsory for the Courts to strictly adhere to Order XXVI – Rule 13 and 14 of Civil Procedure Code?3. Is it mandatory that shares of the property shall be separated by metes and bounds? RuleAt the outset, Order XXVI

Criminal Appeal No. 730 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 9503 of 2018 The Appellant filed this criminal appeal in response to the High Court’s contested decision on an application for interim maintenance made in a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the Appellant’s wife and minor son in