August 14, 2024

Constitutional right to privacy in relation to technology and data collection practices.

ABSTRACT The right to privacy in India was declared a fundamental right under Article 21 by the Supreme Court in the 2017 Puttaswamy judgement. This abstract looks at how this right is affected by modern technology and data collection. With the rise of digital technologies, more personal data is being collected than ever before. This has created concerns […]

Constitutional right to privacy in relation to technology and data collection practices. Read More »

Caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Articles / By By Parkhi Agrawal

Introduction A caveat is a legal notice filed in a court by an individual or entity to preempt any ex-parte orders or actions in a proceeding that is anticipated to be initiated against them. The concept of a caveat is derived from the Latin term “caveat,” which means “let him beware.” In the Indian legal

Caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 Read More »

IRAC- Sneha Milind Kale Vs. Milind Shrikrishna Kale And 2 Others

Judgment Analysis / By By Aarchi Tibdewal

ISSUE: The primary legal issue in this case is whether the applicant/wife is entitled to temporary custody of her minor female child, who was below five years of age at the relevant time, under Section 21 of the Domestic Violence Act (D.V. Act). RULE: The relevant legal provisions are: Section 21 of the Domestic Violence

IRAC- Sneha Milind Kale Vs. Milind Shrikrishna Kale And 2 Others Read More »

Regulatory Oversight Of Corporate Practices Under The Consumer Protection Act: Ensuring Accountability And Consumer Rights

Articles / By By Aarchi Tibdewal

Introduction The Consumer Protection Act (CPA) serves as a fundamental piece of legislation designed to safeguard consumer interests, provide effective redressal mechanisms, and ensure that corporations adhere to fair trade practices. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and its subsequent amendment in 2019, mark significant milestones in India’s consumer protection landscape. This article delves into the

Regulatory Oversight Of Corporate Practices Under The Consumer Protection Act: Ensuring Accountability And Consumer Rights Read More »

Examining The Dynamics Of Policing: Body Cameras, Media Representation And Public Safety

Research Paper / By By Aarchi Tibdewal

Abstract This research paper delves into the detailed interplay between policing dynamics, encompassing the utilization of body cameras, media representation, and its impact on public safety. In an era marked by heightened scrutiny of law enforcement practices, understanding these dynamics is supreme for fostering transparency, accountability, and trust between law enforcement agencies and the communities

Examining The Dynamics Of Policing: Body Cameras, Media Representation And Public Safety Read More »

IRAC On The Judgement In Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjeev Majoo

Judgment Analysis / By By Gauri Dangi

ISSUE: The issue in this case is whether the wife, Ruchi Majoo, is entitled to maintenance from her husband, Sanjeev Majoo. RULE: Wives who are unable to support themselves may receive maintenance payments under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in India. This clause aims to protect women from financial hardship and to

IRAC On The Judgement In Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjeev Majoo Read More »

IRAC On The Case Of Nachiket P Shirgaonkar Versus Pandit Automotive

Judgment Analysis / By By Gauri Dangi

ISSUE:The primary issue in the case of Nachiket P Shirgaonkar versus Pandit Automotive is whether Pandit Automotive breached the contract by not delivering the vehicle as per the agreed terms, and if Nachiket P Shirgaonkar is entitled to remedies for this breach. Whether Pandit Automative was engaged in unfair trade practices and breached the consumer

IRAC On The Case Of Nachiket P Shirgaonkar Versus Pandit Automotive Read More »

Constitutional right to privacy in relation to technology and data collection practices.

Caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

IRAC- Sneha Milind Kale Vs. Milind Shrikrishna Kale And 2 Others

Regulatory Oversight Of Corporate Practices Under The Consumer Protection Act: Ensuring Accountability And Consumer Rights

Examining The Dynamics Of Policing: Body Cameras, Media Representation And Public Safety

IRAC On The Judgement In Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjeev Majoo

IRAC On The Case Of Nachiket P Shirgaonkar Versus Pandit Automotive

Get Help from Our Best Lawyer

Ouick links

Practice Areas

Get In Touch

Constitutional right to privacy in relation to technology and data collection practices.

Caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

IRAC- Sneha Milind Kale Vs. Milind Shrikrishna Kale And 2 Others

Regulatory Oversight Of Corporate Practices Under The Consumer Protection Act: Ensuring Accountability And Consumer Rights

Examining The Dynamics Of Policing: Body Cameras, Media Representation And Public Safety

IRAC On The Judgement In Ruchi Majoo Vs. Sanjeev Majoo

IRAC On The Case Of Nachiket P Shirgaonkar Versus Pandit Automotive

Get Help from Our Best Lawyer

Ouick links

Practice Areas

Get In Touch

Start typing and press enter to search