Research Zone
Ramkhiladi And Another V. United India Assurance Company And Another, (2020) 2 Scc 550
FACTS On October 2, 2006, Chotelal alias Shivram who was driving a motorcycle with Registration Number RJ 02 SA 7811 [“first motorcycle“], died due to a vehicular accident involving the driver of another motorcycle bearing Registration Number RJ 29 2M 9223 [“second motorcycle”]. As per the Appellants of the present appeal, the legal heirs of
Indian Migrants In Gulf States: A Critical Assessment Of Their Issues And Challenges From A Human Rights Perspective
1. INTRODUCTION The research paper emphasizes the conditions of the Indian migrants in gulf countries and the issues and problems which they encounter. The present century is considered as a century of globalization that consists of the international movement, global business, and migrant workers. [i]With India having a population of about 1.4 billion people, it
Bablir Kaur And Another V. New India Assurance Company Limited And Others. (2009) 13 Scc 370
FACTS The present case is a significant one in Indian legal history. The case involves a tragic incident that occurred in 1996, where a car accident led to the death of Balbir Kaur’s son and severe injuries to her husband. The primary issue in the case was whether the insurance policy taken out by the
The AFPSA and its Disturbed Areas Analysis
Abstract The research studies the historical and constitutional validity of Armed Forces Special Powers Act. The Bill was passed by both the houses of Parliament on 11th September, 1958 and later, the AFSPA Act was formulated. It came into force as a result of increasing violence in the North-eastern States. It was difficult for the
Discussion Of Reterospective Punishments Under Article 13(1) Of The Constitution Of India With The Aid Of The Judgement Of Keshavan Madhava Menon V. The State Of Bombay, 1951.
1.0 ABSTRACT The Hon’ble Supreme Court, for the first time, in the year 1951, interpreted Article 13(1) of the Constitution of India[i] in the landmark judgement of Keshavan Madhava Menon v. The State Of Bombay[ii]. The judgement from the learned bench was divided into two groups of opinions. The majority judgement, supported the argument that
Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd v. NTPC
FACTS AND ISSUE The petitioner has submitted a petition invoking Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act of 1996. The purpose of this petition is to seek the appointment of an arbitrator who can effectively address and resolve the disputes that have arisen between the petitioner and the respondent. The conflicts in question emerged