Judgment Analysis

Facts Export Credit Guarantee Corporation (‘ECGC’), a government company, provides a range of credit risk insurance cover to exporters. Haris Marine Products (‘Haris Marine’) is a fish and meat oil exporter. Haris Marine entered into a Single Buyer Exposure Policy (‘Policy’) with ECGC to cover for non-payment by overseas customers of exported commodities and paid […]

Introduction India has a staggering backlog of over 4.7 crore cases pending across various levels of the judiciary, including 182,000 cases that have been unresolved for the past 30 years. According to the National Judicial Data Grid, the pendency of cases increased by more than 27% between December 2019 and April 2022. As a result

Introduction The divorce or separation of parents can create substantial turmoil within the family and greatly affect the well-being of the children involved, leading to potential long-term consequences for their mental health and future parenting abilities. In such delicate circumstances, it is crucial to prioritize the best interests of the child, placing them above the

Introduction:-  The Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 was implemented to protect our wild animals, birds and plants. A Wildlife Crime Control Bureau has been set up to curb illegal trade or smuggling of endangered species in the country. Under Article 51(g), the Constitution of India also guarantees the protection of wildlife and compassion for living creatures.

The appellant – accused, Phool Singh, filed the present Criminal Appeal contesting the High Court’s dismissal of his appeal from the trial court’s judgement and order of conviction and sentence. In a nutshell on August 9, 1999, the accused jumped the wall of the female victim’s house and then entered her chamber, where she was sleeping alone since

BACKGROUND AND FACTS Recently, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in the well-known corporate conflict case known as the Tata-Mistry dispute: Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. v. Cyrus Investment Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. The Cyrus Mistry v. Tata lawsuit, which resulted from a boardroom coup in 2016 that saw Cyrus Mistry removed as Chairman of Tata

INTRODUCTION The Shri Bodhisattwa Gautam v. Miss Subhra Chakraborty[1] case resulted in a significant ruling in favour of rape victims. In this case, the Supreme Court rendered an important decision, determining that under Article 32[2] of the Indian Constitution, it has the power to award damages for violations of fundamental rights, including interim damages for

This Appeal was filed by the Appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)[i], The Appeal was filed by Directors of the Company M/s. Durga Builders Pvt Ltd (“the Company” for short) invoking the provisions of Section 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 for restoration of the

Facts of the Case: The issue of bail in India has been a contentious issue for many years, with many accused persons languishing in prison for extended periods without trial. In SMWP (Criminal) 4/2021 The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India was called upon to determine the constitutionality of the current policy strategy for granting bail

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission’s (hereinafter referred to as the “NCDRC”) decision from 03 December 2003 is challenged in the current Civil Appeal Nos. 5352 and 5353 of 2007. In a nutshell, the facts are that the Respondent No. 1 (M/s. Harsolia Motors), which is in the business of sale of vehicles, purchased fire