Judgment Analysis

Name of the case- Mankindd Pharma Limited Vs Arvind Kumar Trading and Others.C.O. (Comm. IPD-TM) 146/2022 Decided On, 18 April 2023 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONORABLE JUSTICE: AMIT BANSAL By, J. For Petitioner: Hemant Daswani and Saumya Bajpai, Advocates ISSUE – The main question before the Court was whether the trademark ‘NIKIND’, […]

Name of the case – Jawahar Engineering Company v/s  Jawahar Engineering Private LimitedFirst Appeal (OS) Appeal No. 117 of 1979Decided On,16 February 1983At,High Court of DelhiBy, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. KAPUR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. BANGANATHAN For the Appearing Parties: Anup Singh, H.P. Singh, M.M. Singh, N.K.Anand, Parvin Anand, Advocates Published In

Name of the Case- Girnar Food & Beverages Pvt. Ltd. V. Godfrey Philips India Ltd. 2001 SCC OnLine Del 294 First Appeal Order (OS) Appeal No.185 of 1997 Decided On, 19 March 2001 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVINDER GUPTA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUKUL MUDGAL For the Appearing

Name of the Case- Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited v/s Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Civil Appeal No. 2768 of 2023 Decided On, 14 September 2023 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL Published In:- Published In 2023 (6) AIR

Name of this Case -Borosil Glass Works v/s 0.P. Batra Interim Application Appeal No. 2754 of 1997, Suit Appeal No . 484 of 1995 Decided On, 13 January 1998 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.N. KAPOOR For the Appearing Parties: Manmohan Singh, S.K. Bansal, Advocates. ISSUE Whether or not the

Name of the case-American Home Products Corporation v/s Private Limited and AnotherCivil Appeal No. 2159 of 1970Decided On,30 September 1985At,Supreme Court of IndiaBy, HON’BLE JUSTICE A. N. SEN AND HON’BLE JUSTICE D. P.MADON Published In1985 (2) Scale 933, 1985 (S3) SCR 264, 1986 (1) CCC 665, 1986 (1) SCC465, 1986 AIR (SC) 137 ISSUE –

Name of the Case – Ahmed Oomerbhoy v/s Gautam TankCS(OS) No.806 of 2005Decided On,20 December 2007At,High Court of DelhiBy, THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ANIL KUMARFor the Plaintiff: Praveen Anand, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms.Pratibha M. Singh & M.K. Minglani, Advocates. Published In2008 (146) DLT 774, 2008 (2) AD (Del) 447, 2008 (36) PTC 193Judgment TextIA

Name of the Case – A. Kumar Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd. v/s Vikas Tyagi & Another  yagi & Another CS (OS) No. 1627 of 2011 Decided On, 04 September 2013 At, High Court of Delhi By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR For the Plaintiff: S.K. Bansal, Pankaj Kumar, Santosh Kumar, Ajay Amitabh, Advocates. For

This case has been analysed via IRAC method Civil Appeal No. 3351 of 2014 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 17115/2010) Court: Supreme Court of India Coram: Justice Sanjay Karol  Issues: Whether there are sufficient grounds that warrant interference with the concurrent findings of the fact, upholding the validity of a Will? Whether the Will has

Court: Delhi High Court Issue: Whether the phonetic similarity of AZIWOKE (product by Dr Reddys Laboratories Limited) and AZIWAKE (product by Smart Laboratories Pvt Ltd) amount to being “deceptively similar”? Whether a lawsuit can be filed without first exhausting the pre-institution mediation remedy mandated under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act. Rules: Section 23